A comparison of invasive and non‐invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients

By J. H. Burns. 2004

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/47a072b6b8a8c9d9c24db6b1956f55d6b44b7326

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Invasive species grows faster, competes better, and shows greater evolution toward increased seed size and growth than exotic non-invasive congeners (2012, background): “Comparing the effects of invaders on species from native and non-native ranges has provided insight into the role of competition in invasions (Callaway and Aschehoug 2000; Inderjit et al. 2011), and separate comparisons of native and exotic congeners have shed light on the traits and mechanisms…”
A Basis for Relative Growth Rate Differences Between Native and Invasive Forb Seedlings (2007, background): “Much research has centered on describing RGR differences between native and invasive species (Baskin et al. 1999; Bellingham et al. 2004; Burns 2004).”
A Comparison of Plastic Responses to Competition by Invasive and Non-invasive Congeners in the Commelinaceae (2006, background): “However, the only studies that compared plasticity of invasive and non-invasive exotic species report greater plasticity in performance for the invasive species (Gerlach and Rice 2003; Burns 2004), which is consistent with specialization but not the ability to invade multiple environments.”
Tolerance to herbivory, and not resistance, may explain differential success of invasive, naturalized, and native North American temperate vines (2007, background): “…has been used recently for field and greenhouse surveys (Smith & Knapp, 2001; Grotkopp et al ., 2002; McDowell, 2002; Dark, 2004; Cappuccino & Arnason, 2006), few experimental studies with this approach have been carried out (but, see Burns, 2004; Muth & Pigliucci, 2006 for notable exceptions).”
Superior performance and nutrient-use efficiency of invasive plants over non-invasive congeners in a resource-limited environment (2011, background): “Among phylogenetically controlled comparisons of invasive and native plants, high growth rate is often associated with the invasive species under higher-resource conditions (Forcella et al. 1986; Burns 2004; Wilson et al. 2004; Garcia-Serrano et al. 2005; Burns 2006; Gurevitch et al. 2008).”
The “Polyploid Hop”: Shifting Challenges and Opportunities Over the Evolutionary Lifespan of Genome Duplications (2018, background): “Common physiological factors contributing to invasiveness are associated with the necessary tolerance to environmental variation including stress resilience, phenotypic plasticity, or rapid cycling (early and prolific flowering aids in coping with or escaping from unpredictable environmental conditi”
Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence (2010, background): “Moreover, further experimental work suggest that competitive hierarchy between invasive and closely related native species can be reversed depending on resource availability (Burns, 2004; GarciaSerrano et al., 2007).”
Predicting invasiveness of Australian acacias on the basis of their native climatic affinities, life history traits and human use (2011, background): “Invasive alien plants have been frequently reported to be fast growers, particularly when related invasive and non-invasive species are compared (Grotkopp et al., 2002; Burns, 2004; Grotkopp & Rejmánek, 2007; Leishman et al., 2007; Zheng et al., 2009; Van Kleunen et al., 2010).”
Traits Associated with Invasiveness in Alien Plants: Where Do we Stand? (2008, methodology): “1998), Tradescantia, Commelina, Murdannia (Burns 2004).”
Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. (2006, background): “However, some studies have taken a different approach and compared invasive species to other, noninvasive exotics (e.g. Gerlach & Rice 2003; Burns 2004; Hastwell & Panetta 2005; N.Z. Muth, unpublished data).”