Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.)

By Mark E. Slama. 2005

391 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ef2223d6b11ba02d3a537fc03af7c83b0ae2c78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five (2011, background): “Biological and evolutionary approaches posit that gender differences are due to men and women’s dimorphically evolved concerns with respect to reproductive issues, parental investment in offspring (Trivers, 1972; Buss, 2008).”
Human Emotions: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective (2016, background): “Circumstantial support for this hypothesis comes from the experimental finding that physically attractive women, known to preferentially activate men’s sexual arousal, are especially likely to evoke men’s sexual overperception bias (Perilloux, Easton, & Buss, 2012).”
TARGET ARTICLE: Selective Investment Theory: Recasting the Functional Significance of Close Relationships (2006, neutral): “Despite evidence for cooperation and reciprocity among nonkin in both nonhumans (Trivers, 1985) and humans (Buss, 2004), conditions that would make reciprocation by recipients of an altruistic act a driving force in the evolution of altruism may be unduly restrictive (e.g., Desalles, 1999).”
The evolution of intimate partner violence (2011, background): “From an evolutionary perspective, long-termmating offers a number of benefits to both women and men (Buss, 2012).”
Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression (2012, background): “Owing to concealed ovulation and the internal fertilization process of reproduction, a female’s infidelity translates into paternity uncertainty for males (Buss, 2004).”
The Ape That Thought It Was a Peacock: Does Evolutionary Psychology Exaggerate Human Sex Differences? (2013, background): “One way to get around this is to look at the behavior of people who are attractive or powerful enough that they do not have to compromise but are able to get what they really want on the mating market (Buss, 2012; Symons, 1979).”
Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take Fewer Risks than Men? (2006, background): “This difference may make it adaptive for males to be willing to take great risks for a chance of raising their attractiveness to mates (Buss, 2003).”
Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades (2016, background): “These results support the hypothesis that women have an evolved mate preference for mates who have the resources and resource-acquisition abilities to provide for them and their children (Buss, 2015; Schmitt, 2015).”
Revisiting the Red Effect on Attractiveness and Sexual Receptivity: No Effect of the Color Red on Human Mate Preferences (2016, background): “It has been argued that when seeking a LT mate, an important trait for males to consider for a woman would be premarital chastity and sexual fidelity, given the problem of paternity uncertainty (e.g., Buss, 1989, 2003; Buss & Schmitt, 1993).”
Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use (2012, background): “Why men acted this way is not clear, since it flies in the face of the well-replicated finding than men are more interested in casual sex than women even if they are in a committed relationship (Back et al., 2010; Buss, 2012).”
Who is The Fairest One of All? How Evolution Guides Peer and Media Influences on Female Body Dissatisfaction (2011, background): “Thus women who display traits indicating health and fertility will be perceived as attractive to men (D. M. Buss, 2008; Symons, 1979).”
Chinese mate preferences: Cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century (2011, positive): “These results, combined with a growing body of other empirical findings (Buss, 2008), supports the hypothesis that women have an evolved mate preference for mates who have the resources and resource-acquisition abilities to provide for them and their children.”
Sex Differences in Disgust: Why Are Women More Easily Disgusted Than Men? (2018, background): “This reasoning also makes the key prediction that in “sex-role reversed” species (those characterized by greater male parental investment), males will be choosier and females will be more competitive—a prediction that is strongly validated by species across the animal kingdom (Alcock, 2009; Buss, 20”