Competitiveness of Australia as a Tourist Destination

By L. Dwyer, Zelko Livaic, R. Mellor. 2003

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Competing for the disability tourism market – A comparative exploration of the factors of accessible tourism competitiveness in Spain and Australia (2015, methodology): “Dwyer et al. (2003) compare multiple tourist destinations, including Japan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Singapore, Indonesia and New Zealand, and arrive at several favourable tourism factors (Ahidé, 2005): - Heritage resources, such as wealth, parks, landscape, flora, fauna and nature.”
Destination competitiveness: what we know, what we know but shouldn't and what we don't know but should (2016, background): “Another group (e.g. Azzopardi, 2011; Dwyer et al., 2003) in an attempt to include more destinations in the comparisons, has asked respondents to compare the destination to a set of general competitor destinations as opposed to individual destinations.”
Destination competitiveness—Applying different models, the case of Slovenia (2008, methodology): “Based on the Integrated model (Dwyer et al., 2003), 85 competitive indicators were created in the form of 85 statements.”
Destination Competitiveness: An Analysis of Determinant Attributes (2011, background): “Sydney, Australia.”