Family values: Ownership structure, performance and capital structure of Canadian firms

By M. King, Eric Santor. 2008

556 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e823f8e5e4b18cd0e45832e2435d53341e00579

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Innovation and Family Ownership: Empirical Evidence from India (2014, background): “Because most empirical corporate governance studies show both positive and negative effects of family ownership on firm innovation, King and Santor (2008) recently argued that this might be because of misspecifications of the model (simultaneity) and incorrect model estimation because”
Working capital management, corporate performance, and financial constraints (2014, background): “Following Agrawal and Knoeber (1996); Himmelberg et al., (1999); Thomsen et al., (2006), King and Santor (2008), Tong (2008), Beiner et al., (2009), and Jostarndt and Sautner (2010) among others, corporate performance is calculated as the ratio of the sum of the market value of equity and the book…”
Macroprudential Rules and Monetary Policy when Financial Frictions Matter (2015, unknown): “Following King and Santor (2008), the steady-state ratio of net worth to capital is set to 0.6.”
Incentive and entrenchment effects in European ownership (2009, result): “These findings are consistent with King and Santor (2008), who show that family firms with dual class shares have lower firm value in Canada.”
The long-term performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly (2009, background): “firms and the use of multiple voting shares and pyramidal structures is more prevalent (King and Santor, 2007).”
Capital structure, product market competition and firm performance: Evidence from South Africa (2013, unknown): “Sales growth (Growth), a proxy for growth opportunities (King & Santor, 2008; Maury, 2006), is measured as the difference between sales of firm i at time t and its one-period lagged sales divided by the latter - that is, (Salesi,t − Salesi,t−1) /Salesi,t−1, where the subscripts i and t indexes firm…”
Financing Decisions in Family Businesses: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field (2017, background): “(2008) Equity Asymmetric information between shareholders Supply FB/NFB Italy Voordeckers and Steijvers (2006) Debt Asymmetric information between shareholders and bondholders Supply FB/NFB Belgium Waisman (2013) Debt Asymmetric information between shareholders and bondholders Supply FB/NFB USA Walk”
Financial Decision Making in Family Firms (2014, methodology): “…family firms follow an idiosyncratic financial policy (Gallo et al., 2004), most research employs elements of traditional capital structure theories (primarily trade-off theory or pecking order theory) as a framework for analysis (e.g., King & Santor, 2008; López-Gracia & Sánchez-Andújar, 2007).”