A comprehensive two‐moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. I: Description and tests
By J. Cohard, Jean-Pierre Pinty. 2000
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e817d2715198107a4681958f2a9529ec94888fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Hugh Morrison
- Jason A. Milbrandt
- Alexander Khain
- V. Phillips
- George H. Bryan
- Wojciech W. Grabowski
- Song‐You Hong
- Leo Donner
In Global and Planetary Change
- Hugh Morrison
- Jason A. Milbrandt
- Alexander Khain
- V. Phillips
- Wojciech W. Grabowski
- George H. Bryan
- Jimy Dudhia
- A. Korolev
Citations in the corpus
- Nucleation processes in deep convection simulated by a cloud-system-resolving model with double-moment bulk microphysics (2007, background): “The diameter of newly nucleated droplets, Dcrit, is given by Cohard and Pinty (2000), and determines the corresponding increment of cloud liquid mass, Co(qw; q |CCN).”
- Representation of microphysical processes in cloud‐resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization (2015, background): “These parameterizations differ in regard to their assumptions concerning the initial DSD shape and in the use of different definitions of the characteristic time scale of the formation of the first raindrops [Cohard and Pinty, 2000; Milbrandt and Yau, 2005a, 2005b].”
- Sensitivity of a Simulated Squall Line to Horizontal Resolution and Parameterization of Microphysics (2012, unknown): “…schemes have also been widely used to treat droplet activation and cloud–aerosol interaction via prediction of the droplet number concentration (e.g., Ghan et al. 1997; Cohard and Pinty 2000; Morrison et al. 2005, hereafter M05; Seifert and Beheng 2006a,b; Phillips et al. 2007; Ming et al. 2007).”
- Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part II: Case Study Comparisons with Observations and Other Schemes (2015, result): “The importance of riming and particle fall speeds on the distribution of orographic precipitation is consistent with several previous studies (Colle and Mass 2000; Colle and Zeng 2004; Garvert et al. 2005b; Lin and Colle 2009; Lin and Colle 2011).”
- Comparison of Two-Moment Bulk Microphysics Schemes in Idealized Supercell Thunderstorm Simulations (2011, methodology): “Raindrop breakup is parameterized following Ziegler (1985) and Cohard and Pinty (2000), which acts by reducing the bulk collection efficiency for rain self-collection.”
- Modeling Supersaturation and Subgrid-Scale Mixing with Two-Moment Bulk Warm Microphysics (2008, background): “…two-moment bulk schemes [i.e., predicting the mixing ratios and number concentrations of cloud droplets and drizzle/raindrops; e.g., Ziegler (1985); Cohard and Pinty (2000); Khairoutdinov and Kogan (2000); Seifert and Beheng (2001); Morrison et al. (2005)] to complicated and computationally…”
- Evaluation of the WRF Double-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme for Precipitating Convection (2010, methodology): “The formulation of warm-rain processes such as autoconversion and accretion in the WDM6 scheme is based on the studies of Cohard and Pinty [25].”