Does Predictive Policing Lead to Biased Arrests? Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

By P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Matthew A. Valasik, George O. Mohler. 2018

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT Racial bias in predictive policing algorithms has been the focus of a number of recent news articles, statements of concern by several national organizations (e.g., the ACLU and NAACP), and simulation-based research. There is reasonable concern that predictive algorithms encourage directed police patrols to target minority communities with discriminatory consequences for minority individuals. However, to date there have been no empirical studies on the bias of predictive algorithms used for police patrol. Here, we test for such biases using arrest data from the Los Angeles predictive policing experiments. We find that there were no significant differences in the proportion of arrests by racial-ethnic group between control and treatment conditions. We find that the total numbers of arrests at the division level declined or remained unchanged during predictive policing deployments. Arrests were numerically higher at the algorithmically predicted locations. When adjusted for the higher overall crime rate at algorithmically predicted locations, however, arrests were lower or unchanged.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e5989caf0d96931297bdd5cf5f857b78ce5e754

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

  1. Rachel B. Baker

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker
  2. Rachel B. Baker
  3. Mark Warschauer
  4. Padhraic Smyth

Citations in the corpus