Four field-related educational resources and their impact on labor, consumption and sociopolitical orientation

By H. G. van de Werfhorst, Gerbert Kraaykamp. 2001

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e31e4630c031a92aea1aaeff2c7672b25dc0b44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Reimer
2. Aleksander Kucel
3. Clemens Noelke
4. H. G. van de Werfhorst
5. A. Sullivan
6. Thijs Bol

Citations in the corpus

• Labor Market Effects of Field of Study in Comparative Perspective (2008, background): “From a human capital perspective, it is argued that the typical learning environments, as well as acquired competencies and skills, vary between fi elds (Paul and Murdoch, 2007; van de Werfhorst and Kraaykamp, 2001).”
• Social Class, Ability and Choice of Subject in Secondary and Tertiary Education in Britain (2003, background): “Yet it seems that field of study affects many aspects of people’s lives, such as labour market outcomes (Kalmijn & Van der Lippe, 1997; Marini & Fan, 1997), lifestyles (Van de Werfhorst & Kraaykamp, 2001), and political orientations (Crotty, 1967; Nilsson & Ekehammar, 1986).”