Non-conscious Forms of System Justification: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Preferences for Higher Status Groups

By John T. Jost, Mauricio Carvallo, B. Pelham. 2000

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e2bd62e96d7327e3967d7f661fc05b12a7a18b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo (2004, background): “In a third study, which included an analysis of birth records available on the Internet, Jost et al. (2002) found that parents were more than twice as likely to name their baby boys using the fathers' initials than to name their baby girls using the mothers' initials.”
The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology (2002, background): “Three studies conducted by Jost et al. (2002) directly examined the internalisation of status inequality as a non-conscious form of system justification (H6b).”
Effects of Structural Position on Allocation and Evaluation Decisions for Scientists and Engineers in Industrial R&D (2007, background): “…June 2007 Effects of Structural Position the need for dominant groups to legitimize long-term inequality provide explanations for how inequality can exist over time without invoking resentment or unrest (Jackman, 1994; Jost and Banaji, 1994; Zelditch, 2001; Jost, Pelham, and Carvallo, 2002).”
Working for the System: Motivated Defense of Meritocratic Beliefs (2011, background): “Furthermore, although behavioral outcomes have rarely been examined in research on system justifi cation (but see Jost et al., 2002, for an important exception), the desire to view the existing social system as fair and legitimate should in theory infl uence not just people’s cognitive responses,…”
The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore (2009, unknown): “…group relative to more advantaged outgroups on both implicit and explicit measures of intergroup attitudes (e.g., AshburnNardo, Knowles, & Monteith, 2003; Jost, Pelham, & Carvallo, 2002; Jost et al., 2004; Rudman, Feinberg, & Fairchild, 2002; Uhlmann, Dasgupta, Elgueta, Greenwald, & Swanson, 2002).”
Complementary justice: effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. (2003, background): “A new focus on less explicit processes fits well with research demonstrating that system justification operates at implicit as well as explicit levels of awareness (Jost et al., 2002; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002; Rudman et al., 2002; Uhlmann et al., 2002).”