5. Statistics for Spatial Data
By Mike Rees, Noel Cressie. 1993
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Karl J. Friston
- Sergey Levine
- Yoshua Bengio
- David M. Blei
- Mark William Woolrich
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Stephen M. Smith
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
Citations in the corpus
- Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient gamma dose rates from the Dutch radioactivity monitoring network (2009, methodology): “The covariance function satisfies C(h) = C(0) − γ(h), where C(0) is the variance of e, equal to the sill of the variogram and γ(h) is the variogram of e (Cressie, 1993; Christensen, 1991).”
- Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization (2012, background): “Note that kriging with the so-called “Nugget effect” (Cressie, 1993) can also be a non-interpolating approximator that produces a statistics-based bias at design sites and serves as a smoother.”
- Spatial correlation patterns in coastal environmental variables and survival rates of salmon in the north‐east Pacific Ocean (2002, background): “The estimation of any covariance function assumes that covariance is a function of relative distance only and does not vary in space or over time (Cressie, 1993).”
- Small Area Estimation‐New Developments and Directions (2002, background): “, Cressie 1993), but are not in wide use for SAE problems. As few exceptions we mention the articles by Datta and Ghosh (1991), Datta et el.”
- On the Validity of Commonly Used Covariance and Variogram Functions on the Sphere (2011, methodology): “Parallel to the intrinsically stationary process on Rn (Cressie 1993), we have the following.”