Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization
By Saman Razavi, Bryan Tolson, Donald H. Burn. 2012
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Ocean Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Holger R. Maier
- Graeme C. Dandy
- Wenyan Wu
- Jianfei Cai
- Haitao Liu
- Yew-Soon Ong
- Donald H. Burn
- Wei Gong
In Ocean Engineering
- Holger R. Maier
- Graeme C. Dandy
- Wenyan Wu
- Saman Razavi
- Donald H. Burn
- Yew-Soon Ong
- Jianfei Cai
- Wei Gong
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Holger R. Maier
- Graeme C. Dandy
- Wenyan Wu
- Yew-Soon Ong
- Donald H. Burn
- Jianfei Cai
- Wei Gong
- Haitao Liu
Citations in the corpus
- An evaluation of adaptive surrogate modeling based optimization with two benchmark problems (2014, background): “…families of surrogates: (1) response surface surrogates, which are statistical or empirical data-driven models emulating the responses of a high-fidelity simulation model; and (2) lower-fidelity physical based surrogates, which are simplified models of the original system (Razavi et al., 2012b).”
- Protocol for developing ANN models and its application to the assessment of the quality of the ANN model development process in drinking water quality modelling (2014, methodology): “As with any other data-driven model, cross-validation or regularization can be used in the development of ANN models to ensure their generalization ability (Razavi et al., 2012).”
- A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design (2017, background): “(Wang and Shan 2007; Kleijnen 2009; Razavi et al. 2012b; Viana et al. 2014).”
- Review of surrogate modeling in water resources (2012, background): “The optimal number of hidden neurons, m, is a function of shape and complexity of the underlying function [Xiang et al., 2005] as well as the training data availability [Razavi et al., 2012].”