The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government

By 農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター, 英国財務省. 2003

1,666 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change: A Comment (2006, background): “See HM Treasury (2003) for the UK regulations on discount rates.”
Marginal abatement cost curves: a call for caution (2011, methodology): “The discount rate used in many MAC curves is around the 3.5% rate recommended as a social discount rate by the UK Government (HM Treasury, 2003).”
A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches (2016, background): “In fact, a CBA can report on distributional effects, for example Annex 5 of the Treasury’s Green Book (HM Treasury, 2014) considers using utility-based weights to reflect differences between beneficiaries (and those who bear the costs) based on their levels of income, but these are not usually…”
The Value of a Statistical Life (2019, background): “For example, the U.K. HM Treasury (2011) recommends that policymakers use a mortality benefits value for transportation regulations of $2.29 million ($2015).”
From Nobel Prize to Project Management: Getting Risks Right (2006, unknown): “Kahneman and Tversky (1979a; 1979b) found human judgment to be generally optimistic due to overconfidence and insufficient regard to distributional information. Thus, people will underestimate the costs, completion times, and risks of planned actions, whereas they will overestimate the benefits of t”