Predictions of realised fecundity and spawning time in Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harengus)

By G. J. Óskarsson, O. S. Kjesbu, A. Slotte. 2002

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparison of various potential fecundity models for north-east Arctic cod Gadus morhua, L. using oocyte diameter as a standardizing factor (2006, background): “In some studies, the ‘realized’ fecundity has been estimated from the FP by subtracting the detected level of atresia (resorption of maturing oocytes) in the ovary (Greer Walker et al., 1994; Ma et al., 1998; Armstrong et al., 2001; Óskarsson et al., 2002; Witthames et al., 2003) This is difficult, ”
Oocyte growth and fecundity regulation by atresia of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) in relation to body condition throughout the maturation cycle (2003, methodology): “59 in February/March) was rather poor in a historical perspective (Óskarsson et al., 2002).”
Advances in methods for determining fecundity: application of the new methods to some marine fishes (2009, background): “Also Hunter et al. (1992) studying Dover sole (Microstomus pacificus) and Öskarsson et al. (2002) studying Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) have shown it possible to identify atretic follicles in NBF-fixed dispersed ovarian samples (whole mounts) suggesting it might be possible to also estimate…”