Comparison of various potential fecundity models for north-east Arctic cod Gadus morhua, L. using oocyte diameter as a standardizing factor

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emerging Issues and Methodological Advances in Fisheries Reproductive Biology (2011, background): “For fish with determinate fecundity and no recent POFs, the spawning capable phase indicates that the spawning period is imminent and fecundity estimates based on fish in this phase are considered the most accurate due to potential downregulation (Thorsen et al. 2006; Witthames et al. 2009).”
Why Should We Closely Monitor Fecundity in Marine Fish Populations (2008, background): “…between years observed for different species and stocks has been analysed in relation to influential factors known to modulate potential fecundity (Kraus et al., 2000; Lambert and Dutil, 2000; Marteinsdottir and Begg, 2002; Blanchard et al., 2003; Yoneda and Wright, 2004; Thorsen et al., 2006).”
Integrating Reproductive Biology into Scientific Advice for Fisheries Management (2008, background): “In addition, fish may resorb only some oocytes, rather than totally skipping spawning (Hislop et al., 1978; Ma et al., 1998; Thorsen et al., 2006).”
Advances in methods for determining fecundity: application of the new methods to some marine fishes (2009, methodology): “Based on our results and earlier reports (Witthames and Greer-Walker, 1995; Kurita et al., 2003; Thorsen et al., 2006; Kennedy et al., 2007) fecundity is down regulated by the production of atretic follicles during maturation.”