North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP)

By L. Weir, M. Mossman. 2005

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Making Great Leaps Forward: Accounting for Detectability in Herpetological Field Studies (2007, background): “…index’’ used by the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP), takes on values 0–3, where zero is equivalent to not detected; one represents discrete, no overlapping calls; two corresponds to discrete, overlapping calls; and three indicates a full chorus (Weir and Mossman, 2005).”
Auditory monitoring of anuran populations (2009, methodology): “Two US programs initiated by the Department of Interior’s US Geological Survey, the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP; www.pwrc.usgs.gov/naamp/; Weir and Mossman 2005), and the Amphibian Research and Monitoring Initiative (ARMI; http://armi.”
Anuran Calling Survey Optimization: Developing and Testing Predictive Models of Anuran Calling Activity (2010, methodology): “Long-term monitoring programs, such as North American Amphibian Monitoring Program (NAAMP; Weir and Mossman, 2005) and Frogwatch USA (available online; ,http:// www.nwf.org/frogwatchUSA/.) use manual calling surveys (i.e., observer-based calling surveys) to assess anuran populations (Bishop et al., ”
The remote environmental assessment laboratory's acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology (2012, background): “The North American Amphibian Monitoring Program is based on identifying amphibian species primarily by listening for their calls (Weir and Mossman, 2005).”