Songbird response to group selection harvests and clearcuts in a New Hampshire northern hardwood forest.
By C. Costello, M. Yamasaki, P. Pekins, W. Leak, C. Neefus. 2000
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d472f2fa480acd5929490d68faff17a4e1a9033
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- S. Schlossberg
- David A. Orwig
- David I. King
- A. Rodewald
- A. Vitz
- Glenn Motzkin
- F. Vétillard
- David I. King
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS (2005, background): “Some research indicates that small group-select cuts (small harvests often <0.8 ha) may not provide habitat for shrubland specialists (Annand and Thompson 1997, Costello et al. 2000, DeGraaf and Yamasaki 2003).”
- Effects of Experimental Forest Management on Density and Nesting Success of Bird Species in Missouri Ozark Forests (2003, background): “In many cases, these bird species are also absent from smaller patches created by selection cutting (Annand & Thompson 1997; Robinson & Robinson 1999; Costello et al. 2000; King et al. 2001).”
- Synthesis of the conservation value of the early-successional stage in forests of eastern North America (2014, background): “…etc., all of which are subject to natural or anthropogenic disturbances that create open-canopy conditions (Runkle, 1985; Brawn et al., 2001; Lorimer, 2001) and support species particular to various stages of stand development (Titterington et al., 1979; Crawford et al., 1981; DeGraaf, 1991).”
- Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest (2017, background): “…the notion that bees likely benefit from most forms of silviculture, but stop short of examining habitat characteristics (e.g., patch area), which can vary considerably among harvests and have been shown to be important for other taxa (e.g., Costello et al., 2000; Moorman and Guynn, 2001).”
- Avian response to removal of a forest dominant: consequences of hemlock woolly adelgid infestations (2002, background): “In both logged and HWA-killed sites, one common impact on the avian community is the influx of early successional bird species into interior forest habitat (cf. Wetmore et al., 1985; Canterbury & Blockstein, 1997; Costello et al., 2000).”
- Comparative responses of bird, carabid, and spider assemblages to stand and landscape diversity in maritime pine plantation forests (2005, background): “Instead, longer rotations may lead to a decrease in the abundance of open-habitat specialists of conservation concern that are currently dependent on large clear-cuts that are not immediately replanted (Diaz et al., 1998; Fahy & Gormally, 1998, Costello et al., 2000).”