On the wings of checkerspots : a model system for population biology

By P. Ehrlich, Ilkka Hanski. 2004

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d3d6820644fea7533ead7c9bcd269bfa094da69

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? (2005, background): “…selected ESPs, in order to develop spatially explicit management plans for these populations, analogous to the set of ecological knowledge required to develop species recovery plans (e.g. Bay Checkerspot butterfly, http://ecos.fws.gov/docs/recovery_plans/1998/ 980930c.pdf, Ehrlich & Hanski 2004).”
Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing (2008, methodology): “The methods described here can be used for potentially any species, thereby narrowing the gap between approaches based on model organisms with rich genetic resources vs. species that are most tractable for ecological and evolutionary studies (i.e. the Krogh principle; Krebs 1975; Wayne & Staves…”
Perspective: conservation genetics enters the genomics era (2010, background): “An excellent example combining both arenas involves ongoing research (detailed at the Trondheim symposium by Chris Wheat) on the Glanville fritillary butterfly (Melitaea cinxia), an organism for which extensive ecological and natural history information (but not yet a fully sequenced genome) are ava”
More than just indicators: A review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation (2010, background): “Given the many in-depth studies of dispersal and metapopulation dynamics in temperate butterflies (e.g., Ehrlich, 1984; Ehrlich and Hanski, 2004) and the subsequent incorporation of metapopulation theory into temperate butterfly conservation (Schultz and Crone, 2008), we suggest that further study o”
The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography (2010, background): “Precipitation values (log 10 transformed) are more or less normally distributed and the changes under both the drier and wetter scenarios represent small shifts at the extremes, and modest changes in the relative area occupied by drier and wetter climates, respectively.”
Parasitoid–host metapopulation dynamics: the causes and consequences of phenological asynchrony (2004, background): “1997; van Nouhuys & Hanski 2004).”
Habitat fragmentation and landscape change (2010, unknown): “The heterogeneity provided some areas of suitable topoclimate each year over a wide range of local climates (Ehrlich and Hanski 2004).”
The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, methodology): “Butterflies have been used in many of the pioneering studies of metapopulation ecology (Gilpin and Hanski 1991; Hanski 1999; Ehrlich and Hanski 2004) as they are relatively easy to work with, field techniques exist which, though labour-intensive, are easy to apply at the landscape scale (e.g.…”
Effects of habitat fragmentation at different trophic levels in insect communities (2005, background): “The butterfly persists as a classical metapopulation comprised of 300 to 500 local populations with a high rate of turnover (local extinctions and colonizations ) (Hanski et al. 1995, Ehrlich & Hanski 2004, Hanski & Meyke 2005).”
Life‐history, genotypic, and environmental correlates of clutch size in the Glanville fritillary butterfly (2007, background): “Veronica spicata is preferred by ovipositing females in the areas where both host plants are present ( Kuussaari et al. , 2004 ), even though no clear differences in larval survival have been found between the two host plant species ( van Nouhuys et al. , 2003; Kuussaari et al. , 2004 ).”