International Expert Committee Report on the Role of the A1C Assay in the Diagnosis of Diabetes

By D. Nathan, B. Balkau, E. Bonora, K. Borch-Johnsen, John B. Buse, S. Colagiuri, M. Davidson, Ralph DeFronzo, S. Genuth, Rury R. Holman and 11 more. Diabetes Care, 2009

2,915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Members of the International Expert Committee have recommended that diabetes should be diagnosed if A1C is ≤6.5%, without need to measure the plasma glucose concentration (1). We are concerned that practical limitations will lead to false positives and negatives with this approach. A given A1C instrument may identify some but not other abnormal hemoglobins (http://www.ngsp.org/prog/index2.html). How, therefore, can we be sure whether a hemoglobinopathy is causing (or preventing) diagnosis? Before diagnosis, should we not also exclude iron deficiency anemia, which may increase A1C by 1–1.5%, as well as hemolytic anemia and renal failure or chronic infections, which also lower …

Subfields: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d1f26695d11fc1ea99e2971c4b19293354161e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

  1. H. Murad
  2. I. S. Farooqi
  3. J. Yanovski
  4. Janet Silverstein
  5. Silva Arslanian
  6. Dennis Styne
  7. E. Connor

In Genetics

  1. Atul J. Butte
  2. Noah A. Zaitlen

Citations in the corpus