Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application

By Pierre Mohnen, Jacques Mairesse. 2002

427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d057549114e925c3e5f5af0802221e00409e12a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation (2017, background): “(they enjoy easier access to external finance, larger internal funds) and can exploit economies of scale (see Cohen and Klepper, 1996; Mairesse and Mohnen, 2002).”
Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries (2006, neutral): “A summary account of some of the results of this study can be found in Mairesse and Mohnen (2001, 2002); note that what we called innovativeness in these two papers, we choose to name here more simply innovativity.”
The EU 2020 Innovation Indicator: A Step Forward in Measuring Innovation Outputs and Outcomes? (2017, methodology): “This indicator has been used both in analyses of sector and country innovation performance (particularly by the Innovation Union Scoreboard, see European Commission, 2014) and in firm-level studies of innovation performance (Mairesse and Mohnen, 2002; Laursen and Salter, 2006; Leiponen and Helfat, 2”
Strategic Human Resource Practices and Product Innovation (2008, background): “The validity of this measure for innovation has been confirmed in the literature (Mairesse and Mohnen 2002).”
Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany (2013, methodology): “7 As in Mairesse and Mohnen (2002), we actually use the log-transform of this variable, ln[ y1 /(1-y1)].”
THE ELIXIR (OR BURDEN) OF YOUTH? EXPLORING DIFFERENCES IN INNOVATION BETWEEN START-UPS AND ESTABLISHED FIRMS. (2008, methodology): “Following prior studies (Mairesse and Mohnen, 2002; He and Wong, 2004; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2006; Laursen and Salter, 2006), we derive this variable exploiting two items in the questionnaire.”
Young firms and innovation: A microeconometric analysis (2012, background): “…Cohen and Klepper (1996) provide stylised facts supporting the view that the likelihood of a firm carrying out R&D increases with size, while Mairesse and Mohnen (2002) highlight the scale economies and the differences in the organisation of work that make larger established incumbents more…”
Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation (2008, methodology): “For previous studies using some of these indicators, see e.g. Evangelista (1999 and 2000), Veugelers and Cassiman (1999), Kaiser (2002), Mairesse and Mohnen (2002), Marsili and Verspagen (2002), Castellacci (2006) and Reichstein and Salter (2006). innovative mode.”
Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? (2003, background): “…for theories and improved performance, it is their innovative innovative performance measures the overall, broad interpretation in terms of their research input, the size of their in-ventive activities, the quality of their inventive output Mohnen and Dagenais, 2002; Mairesse and Mohnen, 2002).”
The Regional Environment and a Firm’s Innovative Performance: A Plea for a Multilevel Interactionist Approach (2007, background): “Because of their confirmed validity (Mairesse and Mohnen 2002), I chose to measure radical innovation as the percentage of sales from radically changed products and incremental innovation as the percentage of sales from incrementally changed products.”