What Tanzania's coffee farmers can teach the world: a performance-based look at the fair trade–free trade debate
By Bradley D. Parrish, V. Luzadis, W. Bentley. 2005
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Plant Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cd6d30f93800f45b2e3a62087bfcc50b7296d3d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
In Plant Science
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring double side-selling in cooperatives, case study of four coffee cooperatives in Rwanda (2013, background): “Exceptions are the studies by Kodama (2007) on Ethiopia, Parrish et al. (2005) on Tanzania, and Mude (2006, 2007) on Kenya. training; (5) facilitating and intensifying the computerization of the cooperatives and their connection to the National Telecommunication Network; and (6) establishing a guara”
- Reviewing the impacts of coffee certification programmes on smallholder livelihoods (2017, methodology): “In Tanzania, Fair trade was reported to have negligible direct impacts on natural capital (Parrish et al. 2005), but certified producers have been found to have a resulting positive attitude towards environmental protection (Utting-Chamorro 2005; Utting 2009; Ibnu et al. 2015).”
- Mainstreaming Sustainable Coffee (2013, unknown): “Parrish et al. (2005, p. 188) concluded that both seemed complementary, and that “conditions requiring increased supply-side production efficiency would be well served by TechnoServe’s approach, while conditions requiring demand-side market creation are well suited to a Fairtrade-styled approach”.”