Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach

By Lee Failing, R. Gregory, M. Harstone. 2007

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

From Invisibility to Transparency: Identifying the Implications (2008, methodology): “Recognizing that values are part of knowledge means that there must be space for valuebased discussions in any decision-making process whose intention is to restore the voice of Aboriginal communities in the management of resources (Turner et al. 2000, Failing et al. 2007).”
Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. (2010, background): “As such, knowledge claims should be evaluated together, in a structured and decision-oriented environment of collaborative inquiry (Failing et al., 2007).”
Deliberative Monetary Valuation: In Search of a Democratic and Value Plural Approach to Environmental Policy (2013, background): “This requires that the values expressed must demonstrate an ‘evidential basis’ (Failing et al., 2007).”
Incorporating uncertainty and social values in managing invasive alien species: a deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach (2011, methodology): “Guided by the principles of multi-attribute utility theory (Keeney and Raiffa 1993), DMCE solves these problems by formally structuring a decision in terms of multiple criteria and policy options (Lahdelma et al. 2000; Gregory and Failing 2002; Failing et al. 2007; Gregory and Long 2009).”