The effects of forest patch size and matrix type on changes in carabid beetle assemblages in an urbanized landscape

By E. Gaublomme, F. Hendrickx, H. Dhuyvetter, K. Desender. 2008

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cac4e8071c1d3838292741164680d5d7fbd0624

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Luc Lens
2. F. Hendrickx
3. A. Vergnes
4. K. Desender
5. I. Viol
6. Oliver Schweiger
7. Philippe Clergeau

In Insect Science

1. F. Hendrickx
2. K. Desender
3. Oliver Schweiger
4. T. Diekötter
5. S. Aviron

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. F. Hendrickx
2. A. Vergnes
3. K. Desender
4. I. Viol
5. Oliver Schweiger
6. T. Diekötter
7. S. Aviron
8. Philippe Clergeau

Citations in the corpus

• Pervasive effects of dispersal limitation on within- and among-community species richness in agricultural landscapes (2009, background): “As patches differed in size, traps were not placed at the centre of the habitat patch as this would complicate standardization of edge effects (Ewers et al ., 2007; Gaublomme et al ., 2008 ).”
• Green corridors in urban landscapes affect the arthropod communities of domestic gardens (2012, background): “The role of urbanisation should be investigated as is known to strongly affect the diversity of woodland carabids (Croci et al., 2008; Gaublomme et al., 2008; Magura et al., 2010; Small et al., 2006).”