Pervasive effects of dispersal limitation on within- and among-community species richness in agricultural landscapes

By F. Hendrickx, J. Maelfait, K. Desender, S. Aviron, D. Bailey, T. Diekötter, Luc Lens, J. Liira, Oliver Schweiger, M. Speelmans and 2 more. 2009

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4508b032227b3e3ef9a3f2df9f422e9ba40084c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. P. Batáry
2. L. Fahrig
3. A. Happe
4. L. De Meester
5. T. Tscharntke
6. R. Gallé
7. Aliette Bosem Baillod
8. L. Brendonck

In Insect Science

1. P. Batáry
2. L. Fahrig
3. T. Tscharntke
4. L. Brendonck
5. Alexandra-Maria Klein
6. C. Kremen
7. I. Steffan‐Dewenter
8. N. Williams

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. T. Tscharntke
2. P. Batáry
3. L. Brendonck
4. L. Fahrig
5. S. Declerck
6. L. De Meester
7. A. Happe
8. Wim Vyverman

Citations in the corpus

• Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. (2012, background): “A better understanding of how and why patterns of community variation differ among organism groups and across spatial scales is important for conservation biology and landscape planning, as it may reveal the mechanisms that generate and maintain beta and gamma diversity (Hendrickx et al. 2009 ).”
• Landscape configuration, organic management, and within‐field position drive functional diversity of spiders and carabids (2018, background): “…and carabid species wing system as macropterous (fully developed wings, code: 1), dimorph (either with developed or with reduced wings, code: 0.5), or apterous/brachypterous (reduced or no wings, code: 0; Hurka, 1996; Hendrickx et al., 2009), which corresponds to the dispersal ability of species.”
• Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis (2013, background): “…such positive effects of the amount of habitat in the local landscape on species richness within sample sites (Holland & Fahrig, 2000; Fischer et al., 2005; Hendrickx et al., 2009; Bailey et al., 2010; Garden et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2011; Flick et al., 2012; Rodr ıguezLoinaz et al., 2012).”
• Landscape heterogeneity as an ecological filter of species traits (2014, unknown): “Previous studies have 293 already reported such landscape filtering on carabid wing systems (Hendrickx et al., 2009; 294 Wamser et al., 2012), breeding season (Purtauf et al., 2005) and body size (Kotze and O'Hara, 295 2003), in addition to plant seed mass (Tremlova and Munzbergova, 2007; Westoby…”