The London congestion charge: a tentative economic appraisal

By R. Prud’homme, J. Bocarejo. 2005

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing (2009, background): “Altogether, price elasticity for congestion charges seem to vary between 0.5 and 0.7, although London’s experience suggests that it may exceed 0.8 (Prud’homme and Bocajero, 2005).”
Reducing Urban Road Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice (2011, unknown): “Prud’homme and Bocarejo (2005) argue that the LCC is not cost effective, but Mackie (2005) claims that they underestimate the value of travel time savings and the benefits Table 2 Impacts of LCC, Stockholm congestion trial, Milan EcoPass London Stockholm congestion trial Milan…”
A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities (2013, background): “Total 33 99 495 plans in 30 cities worldwide identified the most common mitigation measures in transport (Wagner, 2009) including examples of experiments such as the congestion charge in London or the experimentation with new ideas about the provision of transport in the city or the use of alternati”