Evaluating the physiological and physical consequences of capture on post‐release survivorship in large pelagic fishes

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Post-release survival of juvenile silky sharks captured in a tropical tuna purse seine fishery (2015, background): “Skomal 2007, Skomal & Mandelman 2012).”
Enhancing catch‐and‐release science with biotelemetry (2008, methodology): “A number of biotelemetry technologies are available and have been described previously in a C&R context (Cooke et al. 2002a; Skomal 2007).”
Catch‐and‐release science and its application to conservation and management of recreational fisheries (2007, background): “Pairing physiological measures with post-release behaviour, as suggested by Skomal (2007) , may advance catch-and-release science; and quantitative linkages between sublethal stress measures and mortality should be a high research priority.”
Research Priorities to Support Effective Manta and Devil Ray Conservation (2018, background): “In coastal fisheries where released mobulids are more likely to remain in range of acoustic receivers, researchers could also consider the use of acoustic tags to evaluate survivorship rates (Skomal, 2007).”
Discards, hooking, and post-release mortality of porbeagle (Lamna nasus), shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), and blue shark (Prionace glauca) in the Canadian pelagic longline fishery (2016, background): “As a result, some sort of tag–recapture or telemetry programme is required to properly estimate the post-release mortality rate of discarded fish (Davis, 2002; Pollock and Pine, 2007; Skomal, 2007).”