On being peripheral: Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 105-123
By Jolanda Jetten, Russell Spears, N. Branscombe. 2002
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c2ff1aec402796739c3340d15ab8755f34e72be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- M. Hogg
- Howard Giles
- Liran Goldman
- S. Dommer
- Rohini Ahluwalia
- Vanitha Swaminathan
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Hogg
- Howard Giles
- Liran Goldman
- S. Dommer
- Rohini Ahluwalia
- Vanitha Swaminathan
- D. van Knippenberg
- David de Cremer
Citations in the corpus
- How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong (2010, unknown): “Group members that are not central to the group therefore appear to be highly responsive to the social context (Jetten et al., 2002).”
- Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. (2009, unknown): “…that people’s judgments about their intragroup standing (i.e., their respect judgments) influence how they relate to their groups (De Cremer, 2002; Jetten, Branscombe, & Spears, 2002; Noel, Wann, & Branscombe, 1995; Sleebos, Ellemers, & de Gilder, 2006; Smith, Tyler, Huo, Ortiz, & Lind, 1998) and…”
- Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership (2014, background): “Peripheral group members who anticipated becoming more prototypical display higher collective self-esteem (Jetten et al., 2002).”
- Using differentiated brands to deflect exclusion and protect inclusion: The moderating role of self-esteem on attachment to differentiated brands (2013, background): “Hence, inclusion may not be enough to satiate belongingness for LSE individuals, and their goal following inclusion is likely to involve securing their future belongingness, such as showing others that they are a “good” member of the group (Jetten, Branscombe, and Spears 2002).”