The visual brain in action

By Alfred W. Kaszniak, D. Chalmers, A. Milner, MelvynA. Goodale. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. (1999, background): “…dorsal stream of the visual or visuomotor system) are activated jointly by specific visual patterns together with specific behaviors carried out (or anticipated) that are related to these visual patterns (see the extensive discussion in Milner & Goodale, 1995, as well as the review in Lynch, 1980).”
Understanding the Emergence of Modularity in Neural Systems (2007, background): “Alternative accounts of the distinction based on “perception and action” or “what and how” (e.g., Goodale & Milner, 1992; Milner & Goodale, 1995), or “planning and control” (e.g., Glover, 2003), or even “semantic and pragmatic” (e.g., Jeannerod, 1997), rather than “what and where” (Ungerleider &…”
TRoPICALS: a computational embodied neuroscience model of compatibility effects. (2010, background): “The scope of this theory was later extended (Goodale & Milner, 1992; Milner & Goodale, 1995, 2008) by proposing that the ventral stream communicates visual information to support higher cognitive processing taking place in downstream cortical areas (eg, not only object recognition but also decision ”
Visual Search Strategy in Judo Fighters during the Execution of the First Grip (2014, background): “Milner and Goodale [34] have outlined that no single task is likely to be purely perceptual or purely visual–motor; rather, all tasks are likely to be a result of simultaneous contributions from both the ventral and dorsal streams.”
Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account (2007, background): “However, it remains to be seen whether intentional modulation of affect response coupling can be demonstrated with stimuli that are more plausibly related to approach and avoidance tendencies than those used hitherto.”
Becoming syntactic. (2006, background): “…output. because it has specialized pathways that separately process object properties, called the what system, and location properties, called where system (Milner & Goodale, 1995; Mishkin & Ungerleider, 1982) and the ability to temporarily bind these concepts to their locations (Karnath, 2001).”
Perception through a perspective-taking lens: Differential effects on judgment and behavior (2010, background): “Whereas the dorsal stream of the visual system results in “vision-for-action,” the ventral stream results in “vision-for-perception” (Milner & Goodale, 1995), a finding supported by neuroimaging experiments, single cell recordings, experimental interventions involving ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT…”
Young children make scale errors when playing with dolls. (2006, background): “The phenomenon of scale errors by young children thus contributes to a growing body of developmental research based on dual process theories of visual processing (Glover, 2002, 2004; Milner & Goodale, 1995 ) and extends it in three ways.”
Differential neural responses to overt and covert presentations of facial expressions of fear and disgust (2000, background): “Conversely, visual illusions may be reported in conscious experience while having no influence on accompanying visually guided (unreportable) behavior (Milner and Goodale, 1993).”
Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search (2009, result): “This is consistent with the hypothesis that the P D and the N T may reflect processing activity in the dorsal and ventral streams, respectively (Milner & Goodale, 1995; Ungerleider & Mishkin, 1982).”
Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. (2000, methodology): “Thus, in the region of parietal lobe concerned with reaching, objects are represented, not in terms of what they are, but in terms of how they may be reached (equivalent to the dorsaìhow'pathway of Milner & Goodale (1995)).”