Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model.

By J. Duckitt, Chris G. Sibley. Journal of Personality, 2010

668 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c06c350c6e26698c8a08226b75afde1a9080b2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Big-Five personality prospectively predicts Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism (2012, background): “…goals are made chronically salient by schematic perceptions of the social world, which are in turn the result of the linear combination (and possible interaction) of sociostructural characteristics and stable individual differences in personality (see Duckitt & Sibley, 2010, for a review).”
Does a competent leader make a good friend? Conflict, ideology and the psychologies of friendship and followership (2015, background): “Conservatives relative to liberals (1) view the social world as more competitive (Duckitt & Sibley, 2010), (2) tend to value group-based inequality more (Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994) and (3) perceive out-groups as more threatening (Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Smith, Oxley, Hibbing,…”
The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a New Three Factor Measure of Authoritarianism (2016, positive): “This division is also consistent with Duckitt’s (2001) Dual Process Model (see also Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Thomsen et al., 2008).”
The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. (2011, background): “Such persons should therefore support the existing social order to the extent that it facilitates these values and provides an explicit and easily comprehensible set of norms and mores for operating within society (Duckitt & Sibley, 2009, 2010; Sibley & Duckitt, in press).”
Intergroup bias toward “Group X”: Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals (2012, background): “Although both constructs predict prejudice generally, RWA tends to be associated with prejudice toward groups challenging the status quo whereas SDO tends to be associated with prejudice toward low-status groups (Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; see also Hodson et al., 2010).”
Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations (2020, background): “…of a large body of social psychological research and theory suggesting strong ties between conservative ideology and threat (e.g., Altemeyer, 1996; Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Feldman, 2003; see Choma & Hanoch, 2017, for discussion) – and especially to direct physical threats such as disease (for…”
Why do right-wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption? (2014, background): “Moreover, the stronger the perceived threat, the more RWAs and SDOs feel legitimized in defending dominant cultural attitudes and norms, which becomes expressed as biased outgroup attitudes and behaviors (Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Jost, Glaser, Kruglanski, & Sulloway, 2003).”
Are Conservatives Less Likely to be Prosocial than Liberals? From Games to Ideology, Political Preferences and Votingg (2012, background): “…experience, as well as earlier research on authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and uncertainty avoidance (Jost et al., 2003; Van Hiel, Onraet et al., 2010; Van Hiel, Roets et al., 2010; see also Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Onraet, Van Hiel, Roets, & Cornelis, 2011; Sidanius & Pratto, 2001).”
Meta-analysing the association between social dominance orientation, authoritarianism, and attitudes on the environment and climate change (2019, background): “Both ideologies affect the way the individual perceives social groups, fostering favourable attitudes towards groups of people like themselves and hostility towards those unlike themselves (e.g. Duckitt & Sibley, 2010; Duckitt, Wagner, du Plessis, & Birum, 2002).”
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “Likewise, the DPM proposes that the degree to which RWA and SDO predict prejudice depends on the contextual levels of outgroup threat (for RWA effects) or competition (for SDO effects; Duckitt & Sibley, 2010).”
Core and Surface Characteristics for the Description and Theory of Personality Differences and Development (2014, background): “Using latent-state-trait modelling, Eid and Diener (2004) reported slightly higher 4-week consistencies for measures of extraversion (Con = .”
What determines attitudes to immigration in European countries? An analysis at the regional level (2013, background): “In addition, opinions towards ethnic diversity have been found to be highly correlated with intergroup relations (McIntosh et al. 1995; Thomsen et al. 2008; Cohrs and Stelzl 2010; Duckitt and Sibley 2010; Morrison et al. 2010).”
The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany (2016, background): “There is a long tradition in the political psychology literature that analyses the psychological roots of political radicalism or extremism (Adorno et al. 1950; Feldman 2003; Duckitt & Sibley 2010).”
Perceived Conflict and Leader Dominance: Individual and Contextual Factors Behind Preferences for Dominant Leaders (2017, background): “While this does suggest that perceptions of conflict are integral to preferences for dominant leaders, this conclusion relies on assumptions about SDO having causal primacy over ideology (see Duckitt & Sibley, 2010).”