Multi-criteria decision making methods

By E. Ocelíková, Iveta Zolotová, L. Landryová. 2005

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c0444d773536a43d2028cbd87143f1d0fd148c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Majid Mohammadi
2. Jafar Rezaei
3. Dragan Pamucar
4. Seyed Jafar Sadjadi
5. Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong
6. Geerten van de Kaa
7. Hamed Aboutorab
8. Madjid Tavana

Citations in the corpus

• Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model (2020, methodology): “…criteria based on the preferences of the DM, including the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [1] , the analytic network process (ANP) [2] , the simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART) [3,4] , Swing [5] , FARE [6] , CILOS and IDOCRIW [7] , to name just a few (see [8] for more MCDM methods).”