Effect of a robot on user perceptions
By Cory D. Kidd, Cynthia Lynn Breazeal. IEEE/RJS International Conference on Intelligent RObots and Systems, 2004
349 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bf8c448fbd5fbed502174f442ce95d22fae6f8a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Tal Oron-Gilad
- James Kennedy
- Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Elizabeth S. Kim
- Brian Scassellati
- Justin W. Hart
- Amit Kumar Pandey
- Rodolphe Gelin
In Social Psychology
- Tatsuya Nomura
- Tomohiro Suzuki
- Takayuki Kanda
- Kiyotaka Kato
- Tal Oron-Gilad
- James Kennedy
- Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Elizabeth S. Kim
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Tal Oron-Gilad
- Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Elizabeth S. Kim
- Norihiro Hagita
- Brian Scassellati
- Justin W. Hart
- Amit Kumar Pandey
- Rodolphe Gelin
Citations in the corpus
- Prediction of Human Behavior in Human--Robot Interaction Using Psychological Scales for Anxiety and Negative Attitudes Toward Robots (2008, background): “Kidd and Breazeal conducted experiments to compare the use of artificial agents and robots and found that robots, were more suitable than agents for tasks such as pointing at objects in real surroundings [6].”
- A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its Kind (2018, background): “Studies have shown that a robot’s physical embodiment and tactile communication can make it a more engaging and effective interaction partner than an animated character [5], [20] and that a physical robot is a better support for human learning gains compared to voice or video [21].”
- An affective guide robot in a shopping mall (2009, methodology): “…Hagita ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication Laboratory 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Keihanna Science City, Kyoto, Japan {kanda, m-shiomi, ishiguro, hagita}@atr.jp ABSTRACT To explore possible robot tasks in daily life, we developed a guide robot for a shopping mall and conducted a field trial with it.”
- The Benefits of Interactions with Physically Present Robots over Video-Displayed Agents (2011, methodology): “Other studies have similarly examined the influence of an agent’s or robot’s form and behavior on a person’s enjoyment of [ 10 ], engagement during interaction with [10, 22, 25], trust and respect toward [2, 5], or general perception of the social presence of the agent or robot [4, 9, 10, 22–25].”
- Social robots for education: A review (2018, background): “Robots have been shown to have a positive impact on compliance ( 26 ), engagement ( 21 – 23 ), and conformity ( 20 ), which, in turn, are conducive to achieving learning gains.”
- Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development (2018, background): “Research has explored effect of a robot’s physical presence (Kidd and Breazeal, 2004; Shinozawa et al., 2005; Bainbridge et al., 2008), touch and gesture (Shiomi et al.”
- The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains (2012, background): “Using self-report measures, Kidd and Breazeal (2004) found that a physicallypresent robot was perceived as more enjoyable, more cred-”