Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship

By D. Lerner, Richard A. Hunt, Dimo Dimov. 2018

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Entrepreneurial action is central to entrepreneurship theory, and is broadly seen to arise as a consequence of intendedly rational logics (whether causal or effectual), reflecting reasoned judgment. But, is this always the case? While entrepreneurial action may often be the result of a judgmental decision (between alternative courses of action/inaction), the presumption that reasoned judgment encompasses all the motives, modes and mechanisms leading to entrepreneurial outcomes seems dubious. Building on an emerging literature that seeks to address the boundaries of reasoned entrepreneurial action, we develop the notion that non-deliberative impulse-driven behavioral logics can also be the basis for business venturing. Our framework offers a complementary perspective to the intendedly-rational, deliberate logics perspective, opening novel pathways for future research and theory-building.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bcbd24b0348b38463b639f2ace0011b97f2b7bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

  1. Teemu Kautonen
  2. M. van Gelderen
  3. Joakim Wincent
  4. Ewald Kibler
  5. Matthias Fink
  6. F. Liñán
  7. M. Obschonka
  8. B. Neneh

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

  1. Teemu Kautonen
  2. M. van Gelderen
  3. Joakim Wincent
  4. Marina G. Biniari
  5. Ewald Kibler
  6. Cuong Quoc Nguyen

In Safety Research

  1. Joakim Wincent
  2. Teemu Kautonen
  3. M. van Gelderen

Citations in the corpus