Indirect Networks: An Intangible Resource for Biotechnology Innovation

By Nader A. Salman, Anne-Laure Saives. 2005

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8badd2229fba620c0ac4394bb9636b9e6885b874

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Piers Thompson
2. Andrew Johnston
3. Robert Huggins
4. S. Laforet
5. Y. Wu
6. Johannes K. Brustbauer
7. Yee Kwan Tang
8. E. Malecki

In Strategy and Management

1. Piers Thompson
2. Robert Huggins
3. Andrew Johnston
4. S. Laforet
5. Y. Wu
6. Yi-Chun Huang
7. Johannes K. Brustbauer
8. E. Malecki

Citations in the corpus

• Intellectual capital and knowledge productivity: the Taiwan biotech industry (2010, background): “Further, biotechnology is an industry that is knowledge based and predominantly comprised of small firms involved in R&D (Audretsch and Stephan, 1996; Drucker, 1999a; Salman and Saives, 2005).”
• Network Capital, Social Capital and Knowledge Flow: How the Nature of Inter-organizational Networks Impacts on Innovation (2012, background): “…in knowledge-based industries requires there to be relatively high levels of dynamism to ensure that the most appropriate partners are identified and engaged, if necessary in one-off project-based relationships (McEvily and Zaheer, 1999; Bell, 2005; Salman and Saives, 2005; Zaheer and Bell, 2005).”
• A framework of organisational innovation and outcomes in SMEs (2011, background): “by forming an alliance with universities or research centres, SMEs can get access to up-to-date information) ( Salman and Saives, 2005”