A Framework for Assessing the Relationship between Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance

By S. Sircar, Joe L. Turnbow, Bijoy Bordoloi. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2000

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b9b06622ade4e9f85c8382d2f6f1f0bcedba0b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Jan vom Brocke
2. G. Schryen
3. Theophanis C. Stratopoulos
4. Bruce Dehning
5. Yichuan Wang
6. LeeAnn Kung

In Strategy and Management

1. G. Schryen
2. Jan vom Brocke
3. Maria Fay
4. Oliver Müller
5. Bruce Dehning
6. Theophanis C. Stratopoulos

Citations in the corpus

• Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, background): “O However, the resulting picture is quite mixed: Several studies (Hitt & Brynjolfsson, 1994; Barua et al , 1995; Rai et al , 1997; Tam, 1998; Sircar et al , 2000; Mahmood & Mann, 2005; Martin-Oliver & Salas-Fumas, 2008; Thouin et al , 2008) analyse the impact of IT capital, and find no correlation…”
• Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective (2002, background): “The difficulty with evaluating investments in ES at this very senior level (Singleton et al ., 1988; Sircar et al ., 2000) is one of causality: one cannot be sure that investments in IT are the cause of observed changes in sales, corporate profitability or market share.”
• The Effect of Big Data and Analytics on Firm Performance: An Econometric Analysis Considering Industry Characteristics (2018, background): “While early studies that used this approach to estimate the effect of IT on firm productivity did not yield positive effects (which led to the creation of the term “IT productivity paradox”), more recent literature has reported primarily positive productivity effects of IT [10, 11, 41, 55, 57].”
• Evaluating the business value of RFID: Evidence from five case studies (2008, result): “Some studies show that more IT investment would yield a better performance, but other studies have opposite results (Barua et al., 1995; Bloch et al., 1996; Hitt and Brynjolfsson, 1996; Bharadwaj et al., 1999; Sircar et al., 2000).”
• Determinants of a sustainable competitive advantage due to an IT-enabled strategy (2003, methodology): “Although this dataset has been used extensively in previous research (Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 1996; Hitt and Brynjolfsson, 1996; Lichtenberg, 1995; Mahmood et al., 1998; Sircar et al., 2000; Stratopoulos and Dehning, 2000), the CWP100 companies are not representative of the market as a whole.”
• A resource-based perspective on information technology and firm performance: a meta analysis (2010, unknown): “, 2005), and market share (Byrd and Davidson, 2003; Barua et al., 1995; Sircar et al., 2000).”