The Extended Process Model of Emotion Regulation: Elaborations, Applications, and Future Directions

By James J. Gross. 2015

603 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b74912a9496bb1b791e633115ae590dec2c9894

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. J. Dandy
2. Alfred Allan
3. Ken Robinson
4. Jeremy P. Jamieson
5. R. Becerra
6. D. Preece

In Clinical Psychology

1. Brett J. Peters
2. J. Dandy
3. Aaron J. Altose
4. Alfred Allan
5. Ken Robinson
6. E. Greenwood
7. Jeremy P. Jamieson
8. R. Becerra

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. J. Dandy
2. Ken Robinson
3. R. Becerra
4. D. Preece
5. Alfred Allan
6. Jeremy P. Jamieson

Citations in the corpus

• Reappraising Stress Arousal Improves Performance and Reduces Evaluation Anxiety in Classroom Exam Situations (2016, background): “…model of challenge threat is the idea that appraisals of situational demands and coping resources interact to elicit challenge-and threat-type responses in motivated performance contexts (see Blascovich & Mendes, 2010; Jamieson, 2016; Seery, 2011, for reviews; for a related model see Gross, 2015).”
• Measuring emotion regulation ability across negative and positive emotions: The Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI) (2018, methodology): “…markedly depending on the context in which it is used, and many authors agree that successful emotion regulation relies on the flexible application of many strategies (i.e., strategy use should change across contexts; Aldao, Sheppes, & Gross, 2015; Bonanno & Burton, 2013; Levy-Gigi et al., 2016).”
• Assessing Alexithymia: Psychometric Properties and Factorial Invariance of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Nonclinical and Psychiatric Samples (2017, positive): “The TAS-20 functions as the primary indicator of overall alexithymia and DIF and DDF, whilst the DERS compliments it by providing reliable information about EOT (via the awareness subscale) as well as information about emotion regulation (Gratz and Roemer 2004; Gross 2015).”
• The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (2018, background): “These components are conceptualised within a valuation systems framework; valuation systems being systems comprised of a four-stage situation-attention-appraisal-response sequence, through which a person valuates (evaluates) the meaning of a stimulus (see Gross, 2015a).”
• Establishing the theoretical components of alexithymia via factor analysis: Introduction and validation of the attention-appraisal model of alexithymia (2017, methodology): “Firstly, by conceptualising alexithymia as a set of difficulties during the emotion valuation process (Gross, 2015a) and linking these difficulties to emotion schemas (Lane & Schwartz, 1987), our model can account for why most empirical work finds DFAN to not be part of the alexithymia construct;…”