Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action?

By Sue Hrasky. 2011

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Purpose - Climate change and carbon footprints are among the most urgent concerns facing society and are key issues of corporate responsibility. The purpose of this study is to assess whether Australian companies have adjusted their footprint-related disclosure responses. Adopting a legitimacy perspective, a key aim is to assess whether pragmatic or moral legitimation approaches dominate by determining whether disclosure tends to be more reflective of symbolism or of apparent behaviour. Design/methodology/approach - Content analysis of the sustainability and annual reports of the ASX's Top 50 companies is undertaken to compare carbon footprint-related disclosures in 2008 and 2005. Their extent and nature (action or symbolism) and the use of attention-attracting devices are reported for the more carbon intensive and less carbon intensive sectors. Findings - Footprint-related disclosure rates are increasing, and disclosure is being signalled more prominently. However, while carbon-intensive sectors appear to be pursuing a moral legitimation strategy underpinned by substantive action, the less intensive sectors are relying more heavily on symbolic disclosure. Research limitations/implications - The sample size is small and comprises only large listed Australian companies. Practical implications - While the carbon-intensive sectors appear to be taking encouraging actions, a regulatory response may be required for the less carbon-intensive sectors to take advantage of their market power to facilitate cooperative carbon reduction with broader constituent groups. Further, incentives for the carbon-intensive sectors may be needed to encourage ongoing efforts to bridge the carbon chasm that is emerging. Originality/value - This study appears to be the first to provide direct Australian evidence on favoured legitimation tactics by assessing the symbolic versus behavioural management implicit in carbon footprint-related disclosures.

Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b539cc2c1d291a25f3c87c6100e24ac80c66f07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different (2011, background): “Not surprisingly, Hrasky (2012) finds evidence of both types of legitimation tactics following content analysis of reports issued by the country’s largest listed companies, but the tendency of more carbon intensive vs. less intensive organisations is perhaps counter-intuitive.”
Exploring the determinants and long-term performance outcomes of corporate carbon strategies (2017, background): “To prevent losses of corporate reputation, companies engage in public relation activities and carbon disclosure to show their contribution to climate change mitigation, retain legitimacy for their business and “keep the social contract intact” (Hrasky, 2011).”