New Constraints on the Lyman Continuum Escape Fraction at z ~ 1.3

By B. Siana, H. Teplitz, J. Colbert, H. Ferguson, Mark Dickinson, T. Brown, Christopher J. Conselice, D. D. de Mello, J. Gardner, M. Giavalisco and 1 more. 2007

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We examine deep far-UV (1600 Å) imaging of the HDF-N and the HUDF to search for leaking Lyman continuum radiation from starburst galaxies at z ~ 1.3. There are 21 (primarily sub-L*) galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts between 1.1 < z < 1.5, and none are detected in the far-UV. We fit stellar population templates to the galaxies' optical/near-infrared SEDs to determine the starburst age and level of dust attenuation for each individual galaxy, giving a more accurate estimate of the intrinsic Lyman continuum ratio, f1500/f700, and allowing a conversion from f700 to relative escape fraction (fesc,rel). We show that previous high-redshift studies may have underestimated the amplitude of the Lyman break, and thus the relative escape fraction, by a factor ~2. Once the starburst age and intergalactic H I absorption are accounted for, 18 galaxies in our sample have limits to the relative escape fraction, fesc,rel < 1.0 with some limits as low as fesc,rel < 0.10 and a stacked limit of fesc,rel < 0.08. This demonstrates, for the first time, that most sub-L* galaxies at this redshift do not have large escape fractions. When combined with a similar study of more luminous galaxies at the same redshift, we show that, if all star-forming galaxies at z ~ 1 have similar relative escape fractions, the value must be less than 0.14 (3 σ). We also show that less than 20% (3 σ) of star-forming galaxies at z ~ 1 have relative escape fractions near unity. These limits contrast with the large escape fractions found at z ~ 3 and suggest that the average escape fraction has decreased between z ~ 3 and z ~ 1.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b1d7b8657502913f642d936ae4975b966b2bbc7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. R. Dav'e
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. R. Somerville
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. C. Conroy
  6. A. Dekel
  7. Christopher J. Conselice
  8. Volker Springel

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Christopher J. Conselice
  2. R. Somerville
  3. R. Dav'e
  4. Joel R. Primack
  5. J. Bolton
  6. M. Giavalisco
  7. P. Madau
  8. H. Ferguson

Citations in the corpus