Using Lyman-α to detect galaxies that leak Lyman continuum

By A. Verhamme, I. Orlitová, D. Schaerer, M. Hayes. 2014

210 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Aims. We propose to infer the output of the ionising continuum-leaking properties of galaxies based upon their Ly line profiles. Methods. We carried out Ly radiation transfer calculations in two models of Hii regions. These models are porous to ionising continuum escape: 1) we define Lyman-continuum (LyC) optically thin star clusters, in which massive stars produce enough ionising photons to keep the surrounding interstellar medium transparent to the ionising continuum, in other words, almost totally ionised, and 2) we define riddled ionisation-bounded media that are surrounded by neutral interstellar medium, but have holes, which results in a covering fraction lower than unity. Results. The Ly spectra that emerge from these configurations have distinctive features: 1) a classical asymmetric redshifted profile in the first case, but with a small shift of the profile maximum compared to the systemic redshift (vpeak 150 km s 1 ); 2) a main peak at the systemic redshift in the second case (vpeak = 0), with a non-zero Ly flux bluewards of the systemic redshift as a consequence. If in a galaxy that leaks ionising photons the Ly component that emerges from the leaking star cluster(s) is assumed to dominate the total Ly spectrum, the Ly shape may be used as a pre-selection tool for detecting LyC-leaking galaxies in objects with high spectral resolution Ly spectra (R 4000). Our predictions are corroborated by examination of a sample of ten local starbursts with high-resolution HST/COS Ly spectra that are known in the literature as LyC leakers or leaking candidates. Conclusions. Observations of Ly profiles at high resolution are expected to show definite signatures revealing the escape of Lymancontinuum photons from star-forming galaxies.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fe428c0ee24f5888e7c1ec18843ce6f9329ce1a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Naveen A. Reddy
  2. C. Steidel
  3. A. Shapley
  4. D. Erb
  5. M. Pettini
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. G. Rudie
  8. P. Hopkins

In Instrumentation

  1. Naveen A. Reddy
  2. C. Steidel
  3. A. Shapley
  4. D. Erb
  5. M. Pettini
  6. G. Rudie
  7. M. Bogosavljević
  8. R. Trainor

Citations in the corpus