Defining Benchmarks for Continual Few-Shot Learning

By Antreas Antoniou, Massimiliano Patacchiola, Mateusz Ochal, Amos J. Storkey. 2020

42 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Both few-shot and continual learning have seen substantial progress in the last years due to the introduction of proper benchmarks. That being said, the field has still to frame a suite of benchmarks for the highly desirable setting of continual few-shot learning, where the learner is presented a number of few-shot tasks, one after the other, and then asked to perform well on a validation set stemming from all previously seen tasks. Continual few-shot learning has a small computational footprint and is thus an excellent setting for efficient investigation and experimentation. In this paper we first define a theoretical framework for continual few-shot learning, taking into account recent literature, then we propose a range of flexible benchmarks that unify the evaluation criteria and allows exploring the problem from multiple perspectives. As part of the benchmark, we introduce a compact variant of ImageNet, called SlimageNet64, which retains all original 1000 classes but only contains 200 instances of each one (a total of 200K data-points) downscaled to 64 x 64 pixels. We provide baselines for the proposed benchmarks using a number of popular few-shot learning algorithms, as a result, exposing previously unknown strengths and weaknesses of those algorithms in continual and data-limited settings.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Evaluation & Benchmarks, Meta & Continual Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Chelsea Finn
  4. Yoshua Bengio
  5. Josh Tenenbaum
  6. Han-Jia Ye
  7. Dacheng Tao
  8. Quoc V. Le

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Trevor Darrell
  4. Bernt Schiele
  5. Li Fei-Fei
  6. Xiaogang Wang
  7. Jitendra Malik
  8. Ming-Hsuan Yang

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Chelsea Finn
  3. Tianhe Yu
  4. Sarath Chandar
  5. Mohit Bansal
  6. Mohammad Rostami
  7. A. P. Sarath Chandar
  8. Lei Shu

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Chelsea Finn
  2. Sergey Levine
  3. Tianhe Yu
  4. Antreas Antoniou
  5. Bill Yuchen Lin
  6. Xiang Ren
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Ramakanth Pasunuru

In Meta & Continual Learning

  1. Chelsea Finn
  2. Sergey Levine
  3. Zixuan Ke
  4. Bin Liu
  5. Irina Rish
  6. Eric Eaton
  7. Hu Xu
  8. Massimo Caccia

Citations in the corpus