Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act
By M. Graham. Business History Review, 2005
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8abd04fa119d5fe0eb0a28e72013488693265253
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Albert N. Link
- Donald S. Siegel
- David C. Mowery
- Barry Bozeman
- Bronwyn H Hall
- Bhaven N. Sampat
- C. Helmers
- M. Rogers
In Marketing
- Donald S. Siegel
- William Lazonick
- Weiping Wu
- Bhaven N. Sampat
- David C. Mowery
- E. van Burg
- Bronwyn H Hall
- Georges Romme
In Strategy and Management
- Albert N. Link
- Donald S. Siegel
- Weiping Wu
- David C. Mowery
- William Lazonick
- Bhaven N. Sampat
- E. van Burg
- Bronwyn H Hall
Citations in the corpus
- Creating the Future Together: Toward a Framework for Research Synthesis in Entrepreneurship (2014, background): “Meanwhile, policy fashions rather than empirical evidence or well-established theory tend to influence entrepreneurial behavior and public policy (Bower, 2003; Mowery & Ziedonis, 2004; Weick, 2001).”
- Skilled Immigration and Innovation: Evidence from Enrolment Fluctuations in us Doctoral Programmes (2012, unknown): “…among American secondary school students.6 Third, our study contributes to an understanding of university admissions and the production of knowledge at US universities ( Jaffe and Trajtenberg, 2002; Thursby and Kemp, 2002; Thursby and Thursby, 2002; Mowery et al., 2004; Azoulay et al., 2005).”
- An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage in Informal University Technology Transfer (2007, background): “…the Bayh-Dole Act, see, for example, Stephens (2004); for an overview of public policy related to university patenting activity, see, for example, Mowery et al. (2004) and Link (2006). university-based startups.2 While formal technology transfer mechanisms have attracted considerable attention…”
- Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities (2010, background): “Several general features of the American system of higher education also emerge as conducive to university–industry partnerships: decentralization, competition, and the coupling of research and graduate education (Feller 1999; Mowery et al. 2004; Owen-Smith et al. 2002; Shane 2004).”
- Contracting Over the Disclosure of Scientific Knowledge: Intellectual Property and Academic Publication (2017, unknown): “…While some organizational arrangements are more likely to be associated with particular disclosure strategies, universities’ patent portfolios (Mowery et al. 2004, Jensen, Thursby & Thursby 2010; Sauerman and Stephan, 2010) and the growing contribution to the scientific literature made by…”
- The Choice between Formal and Informal Intellectual Property: A Review (2014, background): “Mowery et al. (2004) provides a useful overview of the U.S. Bayh– Dole Act and its impact.”
- The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? (2004, background): “This argument was particularly salient during the competitiveness crisis in the US during the 1970s, in spite of the failure of proponents of Bayh-Dole to offer much evidence in its support (see Eisenberg, 1996; Mowery et al., 2004).”
- The Us Stock Market and the Governance of Innovative Enterprise (2007, background): “…and Trademark Amendments Act, also known as Bayh-Dole, that enabled non-profit organizations and small businesses (and from 1984 large businesses as well) to retain title to, and hence gain from the commercialization of, inventions that resulted from federally funded research (Mowery et al. 2004).”
- Us Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University (2007, unknown): “University-industry knowledge flows occur through a wide variety of mechanisms, some of which are formal and easily tracked - such as publications, patents, licenses - and others that are harder to track such as faculty consulting and the movement of personnel (Mowery et al., 2004).”