Integrating Transportation Network and Regional Economic Models to Estimate the Costs of a Large Urban Earthquake

By Sungbin Cho, P. Gordon, J. E. Moore, Harry W. Richardson, Masanobu Shinozuka, Stephanie E. Chang. 2001

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a9f68a83b1bc97778002a406453bb6bc65dfa2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

1. Adam Rose
2. Stéphane Hallegatte
3. H. Ham
4. Tschangho John Kim
5. David E. Boyce
6. Masanobu Shinozuka
7. Stephanie E. Chang
8. Y. Okuyama

In Transportation

1. H. Ham
2. Tschangho John Kim
3. David E. Boyce

Citations in the corpus

• Economic Principles, Issues, and Research Priorities in Hazard Loss Estimation (2004, background): “…for optimal recovery (Rose, 1980; Rose et al., 1997; Cole, 1998; and Rose and Benavides, 1999 ), transportation impacts (Gordon et al., 1998; and Cho et al., 2001), lifeline impacts (Rose et al., 1997), overall impacts (Hewings and Mahidhara, 1996; and Cochrane, 1997), incorporation of…”
• A Multiregional Impact Assessment Model for disaster analysis (2016, unknown): “, 2015) and earthquakes in specific (Cho et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2002; MacKenzie et al., 2012; Arto et al., 2015).”
• Assessment of economic impacts from unexpected events with an interregional commodity flow and multimodal transportation network model (2005, methodology): “Cho et al. (2001) developed an integrated transportation network and regional economic model of the Los Angeles economy.”
• Economic impacts of transportation network changes: Implementation of a combined transportation network and input-output model (2002, methodology): “To analyse the economic impacts of unscheduled events, Cho et al. (2001) developed an integrating transportation network and regional economic models of the Los Angeles economy.”
• Firm-network characteristics and economic robustness to natural disasters (2012, unknown): “…from various case studies, (McCarty and Smith, 2005; Tierney, 1997; Albala-Bertrand, 1993; Boarnet, 1998; Rose et al., 1997; Rose and Liao, 2005; Cho et al., 2001) that it is necessary to take into account both direct and indirect losses to evaluate accurately the economic impact of a natural…”
• Measuring Improvements in the Disaster Resilience of Communities (2004, background): “While these models generally focus on property damage, particularly to the building stock, there have been several recent studies that emphasize lifeline infrastructure systems and how their damage could lead to regional economic disruptions (Applied Technology Council, 1991; Rose et al., 1997; Cho ”
• Regional disaster impact analysis: comparing Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium models (2015, unknown): “Cho et al., 2001; Kim et al., 2002; Okuyama et al. 2004; Crowther and Haimes, 2005; MacKenzie et al., 2012). CGE models have been extended and further developed as well, to make them more suitable for the modelling of disasters. For instance, Rose and Liao (2005) have developed a CGE model, where th”
• An Adaptive Regional Input‐Output Model and its Application to the Assessment of the Economic Cost of Katrina (2006, background): “During this period, indeed, production is perturbed mainly by business interruptions due to technical issues, lifeline interruptions, or the impossibility of workers or clients to reach company locations (see for instance Cho et al. (2001)).”