An Adaptive Regional Input‐Output Model and its Application to the Assessment of the Economic Cost of Katrina
By Stéphane Hallegatte. Risk Analysis, 2006
697 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/002340bb82f8b3d7fb33770c6459341212717400
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
- Joost R. Santos
- Elco E. Koks
- M. Thissen
- Y. Okuyama
- Stéphane Hallegatte
- Kash Barker
- Samiul Hasan
- Greg Foliente
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Joost R. Santos
- Elco E. Koks
- M. Thissen
- Samiul Hasan
- Greg Foliente
- Y. Okuyama
- W. Botzen
- J. Corfee-Morlot
In Sociology and Political Science
- Stéphane Hallegatte
- Joost R. Santos
- Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts
- Elco E. Koks
- M. Thissen
- Kash Barker
- W. Botzen
- Y. Okuyama
Citations in the corpus
- INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS: THE NEXT 25 YEARS (2013, methodology): “O models from national tables to estimate the indirect economic loss for hurricanes (e.g. Hallegatte, 2008), flooding (e.g. Steenge and Bočkarjova, 2007; Li et al., 2013), earthquakes (e.g. Rose et al., 1997; Okuyama, 2004), and terrorism (Santos and Haimes, 2004).”
- Regional indirect economic impact evaluation of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake (2011, methodology): “They can be estimated from the reparation or replacement cost (at the present price level) of the assets that have been damaged or destroyed (Brookshire et al. 1997; Hallegatte 2008).”
- Modeling infrastructure system interdependencies and socioeconomic impacts of failure in extreme events: emerging R&D challenges (2015, methodology): “O modeling framework, Hallegatte (2008) proposes a new model, to assess the indirect effects of disasters at a regional scale.”
- A Multiregional Impact Assessment Model for disaster analysis (2016, methodology): “In contrast to, for instance, Hallegatte (2008), the maximum possible capacity is not modeled dynamically due to differences in model properties.”
- Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: a case study on Copenhagen (2008, methodology): “Several authors have suggested that the direct costs, generally evaluated by insurance companies, may be poor proxies of overall costs, particularly in the case of large-scale events (Tierney, 1995; Pielke and Pielke, 1997; Lindell and Prater, 2003; Hallegatte et al., 2007; Hallegatte, 2008).”
- Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis (2017, background): “Moreover, large-scale disasters can have a significant feedback on the economic system through direct and indirect damage (Hallegatte, 2008).”
- Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward (2017, positive): “For example, Hallegatte (2008) provides a model of shock propagation within Louisiana after the impact of hurricane Katrina.”
- The Economic Impacts of Natural Disasters: A Review of Models and Empirical Studies (2019, methodology): “For example, using the ARIO model, Hallegatte (2008) estimates that indirect losses account for 30 percent of the direct losses from Hurricane Katrina, that these losses increase nonlinearly with direct losses, and that they can even surpass them for extreme disasters. Another recent I-O model, the ”
- Natural disasters impacting a macroeconomic model with endogenous dynamics (2008, background): “Still, Hillinger (1992), Jarsulic (1993), Flaschel et al.”
- Regional disaster impact analysis: comparing Input-Output and Computable General Equilibrium models (2015, positive): “The two hybrid input–output models used in this study are the commonly used the Adaptive Regional Input– Output (ARIO) model developed by Hallegatte (2008) and the MultiRegional Impact Assessment (MRIA) model, developed by Koks and Thissen (2014).”
- DISASTER IMPACT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS (2014, methodology): “As an informative example about how pre-hazard mitigation is cost saving, Healy and Malhotra (2009) illustrated based on the empirical data that in the USA $1 spend on preparedness is worth $15 in terms of the future damage it mitigates. This is crucial information for the public decision-making reg”
- Measuring changes in international production from a disruption: Case study of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami (2012, positive): “The adaptive regional I-O model (Hallegatte, 2008, 2011) measures the impact of supply constraints and new sources of inputs on production in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.”