Correlation between male size and territory quality: consequence of male competition or predation susceptibility?
By U. Candolin, H. Voigt. 2001
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a9d06afd389bae183520fc44a0e72725ceb53ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- L. Chapman
- U. Candolin
- Colin A. Chapman
- E. Hebets
- G. Uetz
- Tamaini V. Snaith
- Joan B. Silk
- Daniel T. Blumstein
In Genetics
Citations in the corpus
- The use of multiple cues in mate choice (2003, background): “…and territory characteristics (or nest or other resource characteristics) has been found in several species, which implies that male and territory (resource) traits often back each other up as signals of male quality (e.g. Price, 1984; Kvarnemo, 1995; Bart & Earnst, 1999; Candolin & Voigt, 2001).”
- Comparative age and growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) in lakes Nabugabo and Wamala, Uganda (2007, background): “Larger males would therefore accrue a reproductive advantage (Candolin & Voigt, 2001) and sex-specific differences in the growth rate in the present study may be attributed, at least in part, to sexual selection for larger, potentially faster-growing males.”