Roc curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory

By T. Van Zandt. 2000

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. (2007, background): “Some ROC findings are not easily accommodated by signal-detection theory (e.g., Van Zandt, 2000), but they are no more easily handled by the DPSD model.”
The correction of errors committed with high confidence (2006, background): “This result suggests that confidence was an indication of something that might be ascribed the shorthand term Fmemory strength’ (c.f. Van Zandt, 2000 ).”
Memory is More than just Remembering: Strategic Control of Encoding, Accessing Memory, and Making Decisions (2007, unknown): “…with this claim (Morrell et al., 2002; Stretch & Wixted, 1998b), this conclusion fails to provide a ready explanation of why changes in either prior probabilities (Heit, BrockdorV, & Lamberts, 2003) or payoVs (Van Zandt, 2000) sometimes do influence criterion changes across multiple lists.”
Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. (2010, methodology): “Moreover, using the Poisson race model Van Zandt (2000b) and Merkle and Van Zandt (2006) have shown that the balance of evidence hypothesis can also account for effects of response bias on changing the slope of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (Van Zandt, 2000b) and overconfidence…”