Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers

By M. M. Manifesto, A. Schlatter, H. Hopp, E. Suárez, J. Dubcovsky. 2001

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a45b6b57758946c7866449885b2c57b843f7563

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Molecular markers: actual and potential contributions to wheat genome characterization and breeding (2007, background): “Fingerprinting proWles are also useful to conWrm pedigrees and genetic relationships, or to distinguish closely related lines with incomplete genealogical records (Manifesto et al. 2001; Christiansen et al. 2002; Landjeva et al. 2006a).”
Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Genome‐wide Linkage Disequilibrium among U.S. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Germplasm Representing Different Market Classes (2007, background): “…(Kim and Ward, 1997; Paull et al., 1998), sequence tagged site (Chen et al., 1994), amplifi ed fragment length polymorphisms (Barrett et al., 1998; Manifesto et al., 2001), and simple sequence repeats (SSRs) (Huang et al., 2002; Fufa et al., 2005) have all been found suitable for diversity…”
Microsatellite and SNP Markers in Wheat Breeding (2007, methodology): “Other PCR-based marker analyses such as multilocus systems, for example, AFLP have also not been widely used in wheat since this system also identifies only a limited level of genetic polymorphism in breeding material and routine analysis is being further complicated through the large genome size an”
Estimating genetic diversity in durum and bread wheat cultivars from Turkey using AFLP and SAMPL markers (2007, background): “DNA markers are useful complements to the morphological and physiological charac- terization of cultivars because they are plentiful, are not influenced by plant tissue or environmental effects, and allow cultivar identification very early in plant development (Mani- festo et al. 2001).”
Association between genetic distances in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as estimated by AFLP and morphological markers (2007, methodology): “…provide an excellent tool for obtaining genetic information and their use in the assessment of genetic divergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) has increased in the last few years (Manifesto et al., 2001; Corbellini et al., 2002; AlmanzaPizón et al., 2003; Máric et al., 2004; Roy et al., 2004).”
Comparison of phenotypic and molecular marker-based classifications of hard red winter wheat cultivars (2005, methodology): “SSR markers have been used to estimate genetic diversity in wheat germplasm (Manifesto et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2002), elite lines (Kim & Ward, 1997; Prasad et al.”
Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection (2005, unknown): “…present in the elite germplasm currently cultivated in the main durum wheat producing areas, confirm the findings reported by Maccaferri et al. (2003) and are similar to those reported in elite bread wheat and barley genotypes (Melchinger et al. 1994; Manifesto et al. 2001; Huang et al. 2002).”
Genetic erosion in crops: concept, research results and challenges (2009, background): “3), the resulting diversity can be higher than if only the new releases are included, as for example was found for wheat in Argentina (Manifesto et al., 2001).”
Analysis of genetic diversity in Tunisian durum wheat cultivars and related wild species by SSR and AFLP markers (2005, background): “However, DNA markers have the advantage of directly detecting sequence variation among cultivars and therefore, are not influenced by these assumptions that are inherent to pedigree analysis (Manifesto et al. 2001; Soleimani et al. 2002).”