On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies

By Andrzej Baniak, J. Cukrowski, And Jan Herczyñski. 2005

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a3998f0cf3aa634c1f03064ae7d5bc8b1b81883

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

What Drives Foreign Direct Investments into West Africa? An Empirical Investigation (2015, background): “Results from Baniak et al (2005) show that high volatility of fiscal and business regulations makes the inflow of FDI smaller, macroeconomic and legal instability leads to adverse selection of the investors, and higher variability of basic macroeconomic fundamentals reduce the inflow of FDI.”
Why Does Foreign Direct Investment Go Where It Goes?: New Evidence From African Countries (2012, background): “…(in terms of commitments to and enforcement of rules) (Root and Ahmed, 1979; Schneider and Frey, 1985), the stability of basic macroeconomic policies (fiscal, monetary, and social) (Baniak et al, 2005), and the catalyzing effect of foreign aid (Harms and Lutz, 2006; Kimura and Todo, 2010).”
The effects of transition and political instability on foreign direct investment inflows: Central Europe and the Balkans (2006, unknown): “These inflows have been dramatic both because of their dynamism, as these countries began the 1990s with practically no stock of FDI, and because FDI had important consequences for the transition process and for these countries' economic performance (see, e.g., Bevan and Estrin, 2000).”
Global Foreign Direct Investment Flows: The Role of Governance Infrastructure (2002, methodology): “Governance infrastructure is related to measures of country-specific risk commonly used in the international business literature (Bevan & Estrin, 2000; Keefer & Knack, 1997; Mody & Srinivasan, 1998).”
A Panel Data Analysis of Locational Determinants of Chinese and Indian Outward Foreign Direct Investment (2009, unknown): “For example, Baniak et al. (2003) theoretically suggested there is an adverse selection effect from macroeconomic and institutional inefficiency of the host country, where investors aiming for the long-term development in the host country will be deterred, but those only for short-term rents from…”
Determinants of FDI in BRICS Countries: A panel analysis (2008, background): “It is expected to be a positive and significant determinant of FDI flows (see: Lankes and Venables, 1996; Resmini, 2000; Duran, 1999; Garibaldi, 2002; Bevan and Estrin, 2000; Nunes et al., 2006; Sahoo, 2006). In contrast, Holland and Pain (1998) and Asiedu (2002) capture growth and market size as in”
Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. (2004, background): “So far, few studies have used panel data at all, and those which did, estimated static models only (Bevan and Estrin, 2000).”
Foreign Direct Investment in Southeastern Europe: How (and How Much) Can Policies Help? (2005, background): “Finally, Bevan and Estrin (2000) report some evidence of feedback effects (FDI contributing to changes in the host environment that, in turn, stimulate more FDI) that might explain the emergence of leaders and laggards among host countries.”
Why Does FDI Go Where it Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies (2003, unknown): “The 11 transition countries analyzed in Bevan and Estrin (2000) are Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, and Ukraine.”