The Argument Dependency Model: A neurocognitive approach to incremental interpretation

46 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension. (2008, unknown): “This account, which is based on the architecture of the extended Argument Dependency Model (eADM; Bornkessel, 2002; Bornkessel and Schlesewsky, 2006; Schlesewsky and Bornkessel, 2004) not only derives the data patterns described above – including the existing puzzles– but also has the additional…”
The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. (2006, background): “In particular, we assume that factors such as prosody, plausibility/ world knowledge, frequency of occurrence and semantic updating do not modulate the processing of core relations in Phase 2 (cf. Bornkessel, 2002; Schlesewsky & Bornkessel, 2004).”
Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing (2003, methodology): “There is also direct empirical support for assuming that a thematic reanalysis may be initiated from 200 ms onwards: the early positivity for object-experiencer verbs in unambiguously case marked structures in Bornkessel et al. (2002b), i.”