Inequality, institution and differential paths of growth among New World economies
By Stanley L. Engerman, S. Haber, Kenneth L. Sokoloff. 2000
134 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a015007ae521bc0e592d05128048bb7fef2b301
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jordan I. Siegel
- Mark J. Roe
- Florencia Torche
- Xiang Zhou
- M. Hout
- Tabitha G. Wilbur
- Vincent J. Roscigno
Citations in the corpus
- Political instability: Effects on financial development, roots in the severity of economic inequality (2011, result): “…stabilizing institutions could be due to severe historical inequality having prevented politically stable institutions, in a way similar to how Engerman, Haber, and Sokoloff (2000) show that poor institutions developed in New World economies that were based on exploitive, plantation-style…”
- Intergenerational Mobility and Inequality: The Latin American Case* (2014, background): “As a result, by 1900, even in the most highly educated Latin American countries, the literacy rate reached only ∼50% and was less than 20% in the least-educated countries (Engerman et al. 2000).”
- The Political Economy of Financial Regulation: Evidence from U.S. State Usury Laws in the 19th Century (2010, unknown): “…argue that wealth-based suffrage laws are primarily driven by private interests [Engerman and Sokoloff (1997), Engerman and Sokoloff (2005), Engerman, Haber, and Sokoloff (2000), and Sokoloff and Engerman (2000)] and are less affected by general economic conditions, making it an effectual…”