The myth of metabolic cold adaptation: oxygen consumption in stenothermal Antarctic bivalves

By L. Peck, Lucy Z. Conway. Geological Society Special Publication, 2000

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a005340ba81014c5f778b1499ed67e66fbefbcf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Lack of an HSP70 heat shock response in two Antarctic marine invertebrates (2008, background): “This marine environment is also the habitat of some of the World's most stenothermal species described to date (Peck and Conway, 2000).”
The HSP70 heat shock response in the Antarctic fish Harpagifer antarcticus (2007, unknown): “These animals are highly stenothermal having survivable temperature envelopes between 5 and 12°C above the minimum sea temperature of i1.86°C (Somero and DeVries 1967; Peck and Conway 2000; Peck 2002).”
Growth efficiency and temperature in scallops: a comparative analysis of species adapted to different temperatures (2004, background): “…temperature and their long-term evolutionary adaptation to certain temperature regimes have been fairly well documented, although the underlying molecular and biochemical mechanisms remain to be fully elaborated (Clarke & Johnston 1999; Peck & Conway 2000; Pörtner 2002a,c; Heilmayer & Brey 2003).”
Why does metabolism scale with temperature (2004, background): “3a,b) is typical of all studies of marine organisms to date (Ivleva 1980; Ikeda 1985; Clarke & Johnston 1999; Peck & Conway 2000; Ikeda et al .”
Antarctic Marine Biodiversity: Adaptations, Environments and Responses to Change (2018, background): “MO2 increases across latitudes towards the tropics, and as temperature increases, in fish (Clarke & Johnston 1999) and invertebrates (Peck & Conway 2000, Peck et al.”
Extreme sensitivity of biological function to temperature in Antarctic marine species (2004, background): “temperatures below, or around 10°C ( Peck & Conway 2000; Peck et al. 2002), and”
Thermal tolerance ranges and climate variability: A comparison between bivalves from differing climates (2007, background): “Fishes and bivalves from the Antarctic are known to have narrow thermal tolerance windows relative to temperate fishes with broad thermal tolerance windows that reflect the higher variation in their environmental temperatures (Somero & de Vries 1967, Brett 1970, Peck & Conway 2000, Peck et al. 200”
Predatory behaviour and metabolic costs in the Antarctic muricid gastropod Trophon longstaffi (2003, background): “Rates of oxygen consumption in polar marine ectotherms are low in comparison with temperate and tropical species, and there is no evidence of metabolic compensation for low temperature at the whole-animal level (Clarke and Johnston 1999; Peck and Conway 2000 ).”
Hyperoxia alleviates thermal stress in the Antarctic bivalve, Laternula elliptica: evidence for oxygen limited thermal tolerance (2006, background): “Antarctic marine ectotherms live at the low end of the temperature continuum in marine environments, and are considered stenothermal (Somero and De Vries 1967; Peck and Conway 2000; Pörtner et al. 1999a, 2000).”
Climate-dependent evolution of Antarctic ectotherms: An integrative analysis (2006, background): “9) and in Antarctic invertebrates (Peck and Conway, 2000).”
Poor acclimation capacities in Antarctic marine ectotherms (2010, background): “Clarke and Johnston 1999; Peck and Conway 2000 ), but it may indicate that not only has there been no metabolic compensation following 60 days of exposure to elevated temperature, but there has been significant overcompensation sensu Precht et al. (1954).”
Lack of acclimation in Ophionotus victoriae: brittle stars are not fish (2009, background): “…manipulation of seawater temperatures has shown that Antarctic invertebrates, in particular, are extremely sensitive to temperature changes, with short-term survivable temperature envelopes of only between 5 and 12°C above the minimum sea temperature of ¡1.86°C (Peck and Conway 2000; Peck 2002).”
Animal temperature limits and ecological relevance: effects of size, activity and rates of change (2009, background): “However, Antarctic marine ectotherms are recognized as among the most stenothermal on Earth (Peck & Conway 2000; Aronson et al. 2007).”
Climate change and temperature-dependent biogeography: oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance in animals (2001, unknown): “Fig. 4 Thermal tolerance data collected by Peck and Conway (2000) for marine ectotherms from various latitudes (based on classical determinations during short-term heating protocols and on previous determinations of TcII) turned into a modelled depiction of cold and heat tolerance in a latitudinal”