THE IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST'S D MEASURE CAN MINIMIZE A COGNITIVE SKILL CONFOUND: COMMENT ON McFARLAND AND CROUCH (2002)

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Narcissistic Fragility: Rethinking Its Links to Explicit and Implicit Self-esteem (2010, background): “These include, not only the specificity with which ISE is assessed (Campbell et al, 2007 ; Sakellaropoulo & Baldwin, 2007 ), but also how narcissism is defined and measured (Bosson & Prewitt-Freilino, 2007 ) as well as the structural peculiarities of indirect measures (DeHouwer & Moors, 2007 ) a”
Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007, unknown): “The accumulated literature finds that (a) the IAT is both related to and distinct from self-report measures of similar constructs (Nosek & Smyth, 2007 ); (b) the relationship between the IAT and self-report, at least for attitudes, is moderated by multiple factors (Hofmann, Gawronski, Gschwendner, ”
Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, background): “Thus, even when rescaling happened to reduce biases in some studies (Cai, Sriram, Greenwald, & McFarland, 2004 ; Greenwald et al, 2003 ; Mierke & Klauer, 2003 ), this cannot be expected to hold in general, on theoretical or formal grounds.”