An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective

By T. Lirn, H. Thanopoulou, Malcolm John Beynon, A. Beresford. 2004

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89bf5b39e602a7a82a2cdc19b8ec4d330a7da415

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. A. Pallis
2. F. Parola
3. G. Satta
4. Shao-Wei Lam
5. Mary R. Brooks
6. Loon Ching Tang
7. Joyce Mei Wan Low
8. Theo E. Notteboom *

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. A. Pallis
2. F. Parola
3. G. Satta
4. Theo E. Notteboom *
5. Shao-Wei Lam
6. Mary R. Brooks
7. Loon Ching Tang
8. Joyce Mei Wan Low

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Mary R. Brooks
2. F. Parola
3. Theo E. Notteboom *
4. A. Pallis

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing port governance models: process and performance components (2008, background): “also collected performance ratings from a user perspective, and thus were able to do pair-wise comparison of importance and performance factors [8].”
• Understanding Port Choice Behavior—A Network Perspective (2011, background): “Responses are prioritized in some manner so that weights can be attached to various factors affecting port choice (Song and Yeo 2004; Lirn et al. 2004).”
• The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping (2017, background): “The port choice criteria used by shipping lines are well documented (see literature overviews provided in Lirn et al., 2004; Tongzon and Sawant, 2007; Chang et al., 2008; Wiegmans et al., 2008; and Lam and Dai, 2012), with four distinctive groups of selection factors relevant to shipping lines…”