A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction With Life Scale: an RG study

By Matt Vassar. 2007

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/89abbc582d8aaed1ccd5f30901be3360f3ed8779

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. W. Pavot
2. E. Diener
3. Viren Swami
4. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
5. M. Roth
6. E. Braehler
7. Heide Glaesmer
8. Chia-huei Wu

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. W. Pavot
2. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
3. Viren Swami
4. Rui Zheng
5. Xiao-peng Ren
6. Xinwen Bai
7. M. Roth
8. Chia-huei Wu

In Social Psychology

1. W. Pavot
2. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
3. Viren Swami
4. E. Diener
5. Chia-huei Wu
6. Rui Zheng
7. Xiao-peng Ren
8. Xinwen Bai

Citations in the corpus

• The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. (2011, background): “80 (Diener et al., 1985; Lewis et al., 1995; Vassar, 2008), but there is a considerable degree of variability across different samples (Vassar, 2008).”
• Psychometric Evaluation of the Malay Satisfaction With Life Scale (2009, background): “A large body of research has also examined the psychometric properties of the SWLS (for reviews, see Pavot and Diener 2008; Vassar 2008 ).”
• Psychometric Evaluation of the Hebrew Language Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (2010, unknown): “Evidence of the SWLS’ reliability and validity has been reported in several studies (Pavot and Diener 1993; Vassar 2008).”
• The Satisfaction With Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction (2008, methodology): “A recent meta-analysis (Vassar, 2008), including reliability data for the SWLS from more than 60 studies, provides much additional information regarding scale performance and reliability across a number of different sample characteristics.”
• The Psychometric Evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale Using a Nationally Representative Sample of China (2011, methodology): “Examinations have included internal consistency and test–retest reliability (see Pavot and Diener 1993), reliability generalisation (Vassar 2008), construct validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity (Arrindell et al. 1999; Lucas et al. 1996; Pavot and Diener 1993).”